Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Nikon glass worth the $$$?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jwstl" data-source="post: 164997" data-attributes="member: 12977"><p>The answer is never as simple as Yes or No. It really depends on the lens in question and how comfortable you are with third parties. For the 70-200 2.8s I would choose the Nikon over the others if money were no object. Sigma is making some fine glass and, from I've read, has improved their repair service so I won't hesitate buying from them. However, the 70-200 is not their best and the Nikon and Tamron should outperform it. I actually had this decision to make recently and guess which of the three I bought: none of them. I went with the new Nikon 70-200 f/4 because it's lighter, less expensive, and received rave reviews for image quality. I didn't need the 2.8 so the f/4 was the lens for for me. And I haven't been disappointed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jwstl, post: 164997, member: 12977"] The answer is never as simple as Yes or No. It really depends on the lens in question and how comfortable you are with third parties. For the 70-200 2.8s I would choose the Nikon over the others if money were no object. Sigma is making some fine glass and, from I've read, has improved their repair service so I won't hesitate buying from them. However, the 70-200 is not their best and the Nikon and Tamron should outperform it. I actually had this decision to make recently and guess which of the three I bought: none of them. I went with the new Nikon 70-200 f/4 because it's lighter, less expensive, and received rave reviews for image quality. I didn't need the 2.8 so the f/4 was the lens for for me. And I haven't been disappointed. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Nikon glass worth the $$$?
Top