Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Nikon don't like FX Wide-angle users ???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Geoffc" data-source="post: 262446" data-attributes="member: 8705"><p>The 16-35 F4 is equivalent to 11mm on DX. The 14-24 is in a different place. Part of the thinking (a large part) is the increased cost of lenses. Maybe you should have got a D7100 DX instead as it would have given very good results even at moderately high ISO.</p><p></p><p>It feels like you bought a classic used car at a great price but now find it guzzles fuel and has expensive parts. Perhaps it was not the right choice when considering the whole package. When I went FX I budgeted about £4000 to do the switch, and I already had the 70-200 2.8.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Geoffc, post: 262446, member: 8705"] The 16-35 F4 is equivalent to 11mm on DX. The 14-24 is in a different place. Part of the thinking (a large part) is the increased cost of lenses. Maybe you should have got a D7100 DX instead as it would have given very good results even at moderately high ISO. It feels like you bought a classic used car at a great price but now find it guzzles fuel and has expensive parts. Perhaps it was not the right choice when considering the whole package. When I went FX I budgeted about £4000 to do the switch, and I already had the 70-200 2.8. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Nikon don't like FX Wide-angle users ???
Top