Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Skytalker" data-source="post: 192968" data-attributes="member: 15613">Canon 5d Mark III, because it is a more versatile camera than the D800 and overall it has a better IQ. I know, I know the fantastic DR of the D800. Well yes at basic ISO,&nbsp; because after that, say around 1600, Canon is better even in DR. whoever interested have a look DXOmark measurements. But then is the AF system, and practice has shown that the Canon is better. And then it is able to shoot 6 fps and that is acceptable for action photo, not the best but acceptable.And then video is far better, Nikon still need to evolve in this direction.We all expected that Nikon will launch on the market a camera like that (5D3) and that would have been undoubtedly the successor of the D700, but obviously Nikon did not care about this as well as it did not care about the successor of the D400. Instead we have got the king of dust and oil, and the king of resolution and focusing issues.Well done Nikon !</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Skytalker, post: 192968, member: 15613"] Canon 5d Mark III, because it is a more versatile camera than the D800 and overall it has a better IQ. I know, I know the fantastic DR of the D800. Well yes at basic ISO, because after that, say around 1600, Canon is better even in DR. whoever interested have a look DXOmark measurements. But then is the AF system, and practice has shown that the Canon is better. And then it is able to shoot 6 fps and that is acceptable for action photo, not the best but acceptable. And then video is far better, Nikon still need to evolve in this direction. We all expected that Nikon will launch on the market a camera like that (5D3) and that would have been undoubtedly the successor of the D700, but obviously Nikon did not care about this as well as it did not care about the successor of the D400. Instead we have got the king of dust and oil, and the king of resolution and focusing issues. Well done Nikon ! [/QUOTE]

Verification