Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 522319" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>Do you mean in terms of MP's?  That's actually quite typical in the Pro series cameras.  20MP's vs. 24MP's means you're losing 10% in image size, but the gains in IQ are more than made up for in the "loss".  Larger pixel sizes are going to help tremendously with reducing noise (which to [USER=25095]@RocketCowboy[/USER]'s point below means that I expect the D500 to easily rival the D600/610 in ISO noise capabilities) as well as light information (bigger pixel = more light).  20MP's is more than enough for just about anything you're going to do with prints (16x20 requires a minimum of 8MP's) and beyond what you'll need for posting on the internet.  Heck, the D4s is 16MPs and I don't remember anyone ever saying they couldn't blow up those images as big as they need them.  I think we get way too hung up on MP's, myself included.</p></blockquote><p></p>