Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3200
Nikon D3100 vs D3200
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="marce" data-source="post: 79799" data-attributes="member: 10684"><p>I have had both cameras and now use the D3200. I have produced nice pictures with both, but do prefer the quality of the D3200. That said I am now printing my standard pictures at A4 or 8x10, I love the large format prints, they just give you more and with my terrible eye sight I dont have to squint as much. And when funds are available I am going to buy a Cannon A3 picture. The D3200 allows me to print basic photos out at A4 that look just the same as standard size prints. I have more invested in lenses than I do the Camera body with my favorites being the Tamron 60mm macro and the Nikon 50mm AF D.</p><p>As to processing time, I shoot RAW and use Lightroom 4 on a I3 core powered laptopwith 8G ram, processing is slower with the D3200 files as they are bigger, ut its not too bad. When I use my works I7 core machine things run along pretty smoothly. My next Camera will be the D600 though Same pixel count but larger senser cant wait. I shoot mainly in manual and aperture and hate not having bracketing features and have never used the auto functions on the D3200.</p><p>Conclusion, I do like the images from the D3200 lots of detail, and to my eyes a more pleasing result when viewed either on screen or print, I love it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="marce, post: 79799, member: 10684"] I have had both cameras and now use the D3200. I have produced nice pictures with both, but do prefer the quality of the D3200. That said I am now printing my standard pictures at A4 or 8x10, I love the large format prints, they just give you more and with my terrible eye sight I dont have to squint as much. And when funds are available I am going to buy a Cannon A3 picture. The D3200 allows me to print basic photos out at A4 that look just the same as standard size prints. I have more invested in lenses than I do the Camera body with my favorites being the Tamron 60mm macro and the Nikon 50mm AF D. As to processing time, I shoot RAW and use Lightroom 4 on a I3 core powered laptopwith 8G ram, processing is slower with the D3200 files as they are bigger, ut its not too bad. When I use my works I7 core machine things run along pretty smoothly. My next Camera will be the D600 though Same pixel count but larger senser cant wait. I shoot mainly in manual and aperture and hate not having bracketing features and have never used the auto functions on the D3200. Conclusion, I do like the images from the D3200 lots of detail, and to my eyes a more pleasing result when viewed either on screen or print, I love it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3200
Nikon D3100 vs D3200
Top