Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3200
Nikon D3100 vs D3200
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eye-level" data-source="post: 53611" data-attributes="member: 6548"><p>"Ezawa explained that image quality at ISO 6400 is 'almost the same' as that on the D3100, despite the smaller pixels, though, in 'very specific conditions' the quality of the D3100 is 'slightly better'. </p><p></p><p>But, at the commonly used ISO 200, 800 or 400 levels, he said there is no difference in quality. </p><p></p><p>Nikon confirmed to AP that the D700 – which was announced almost four years ago – is still being manufactured, despite yesterday being omitted from a press presentation slide showing the firm's current DSLR line-up. "</p><p></p><p>I think amateur/weekend shutter bangers will come to rue these big megapixel rigs because they are gonna require much better lenses and much bigger storage devices and much faster processers...so unless you have the ghitas for the new camera and the newest micro technological marvel lenses (a few of the older ones are good enough but they are still expensive after all these years and models) and the computer too then stick with the D3000/D3100...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eye-level, post: 53611, member: 6548"] "Ezawa explained that image quality at ISO 6400 is 'almost the same' as that on the D3100, despite the smaller pixels, though, in 'very specific conditions' the quality of the D3100 is 'slightly better'. But, at the commonly used ISO 200, 800 or 400 levels, he said there is no difference in quality. Nikon confirmed to AP that the D700 – which was announced almost four years ago – is still being manufactured, despite yesterday being omitted from a press presentation slide showing the firm's current DSLR line-up. " I think amateur/weekend shutter bangers will come to rue these big megapixel rigs because they are gonna require much better lenses and much bigger storage devices and much faster processers...so unless you have the ghitas for the new camera and the newest micro technological marvel lenses (a few of the older ones are good enough but they are still expensive after all these years and models) and the computer too then stick with the D3000/D3100... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3200
Nikon D3100 vs D3200
Top