Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
nikon as 24-120 f4 VR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 523181" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>I just looked in my active LR catalog which currently contains the last 4 months of 2015 photos. In it there are 945 photos taken with the 24-120mm f4 (it lives on my FX cameras). Almost half (451) of the photos were taken at ISO 100. Only about 10% were taken at ISO levels above 6400, and in those cases it had more to do with the aperture I needed to shoot (above f8) than available light. </p><p></p><p>I say this to dispel the idea that an f4 lens somehow requires you to shoot at high ISO levels. That's just plain nuts. It's one stop less bright, so you've got one add'l stop of required ISO over your f2.8 lens. It's plenty sharp wide open, but yes it gets better at f5.6. It also saves you a wad of cash and weight if you don't want to spring for the 24-70mm f2.8, and it's got that extra reach that will keep you from wondering if you should have brought the 70-200mm with you as well. Perfect walkaround lens on a FX body, and a great lens on DX if you're looking to do candid street portraits or something similar.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 523181, member: 9240"] I just looked in my active LR catalog which currently contains the last 4 months of 2015 photos. In it there are 945 photos taken with the 24-120mm f4 (it lives on my FX cameras). Almost half (451) of the photos were taken at ISO 100. Only about 10% were taken at ISO levels above 6400, and in those cases it had more to do with the aperture I needed to shoot (above f8) than available light. I say this to dispel the idea that an f4 lens somehow requires you to shoot at high ISO levels. That's just plain nuts. It's one stop less bright, so you've got one add'l stop of required ISO over your f2.8 lens. It's plenty sharp wide open, but yes it gets better at f5.6. It also saves you a wad of cash and weight if you don't want to spring for the 24-70mm f2.8, and it's got that extra reach that will keep you from wondering if you should have brought the 70-200mm with you as well. Perfect walkaround lens on a FX body, and a great lens on DX if you're looking to do candid street portraits or something similar. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
nikon as 24-120 f4 VR
Top