Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
NIKON AF ZOOM NIKKOR 35-70MM F/2.8 FX vs Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 471899" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>the 35-70 is a fantastic lens. heavier? than a hobbyist lens? well sure. if the 35-70 is considered heavy to you, then dont go for a 70/80-200 2.8. 35-70 is featherweight. the push pull will be your only hurdle with that lens. takes a bit of getting used to because its counterintuitive. you think that extending the lens may be zooming in or getting closer and pulling it back would make it be wider but its the opposite. killer lens and easily a better decision over the variable aperture lens. no VR though. no comparison with sharpness. brighter VF and 2.8 as well. build is like when nikon made things because they cared. like a tank. today its cheap garbage plastic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 471899, member: 14443"] the 35-70 is a fantastic lens. heavier? than a hobbyist lens? well sure. if the 35-70 is considered heavy to you, then dont go for a 70/80-200 2.8. 35-70 is featherweight. the push pull will be your only hurdle with that lens. takes a bit of getting used to because its counterintuitive. you think that extending the lens may be zooming in or getting closer and pulling it back would make it be wider but its the opposite. killer lens and easily a better decision over the variable aperture lens. no VR though. no comparison with sharpness. brighter VF and 2.8 as well. build is like when nikon made things because they cared. like a tank. today its cheap garbage plastic. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
NIKON AF ZOOM NIKKOR 35-70MM F/2.8 FX vs Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR
Top