Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Geoffc" data-source="post: 137986" data-attributes="member: 8705"><p>I use the 24-120 more than anything else, it's as close to a replacement for my DX 18-200 (now sold although I keep regretting it) that I have at the moment. </p><p></p><p>Your next question is probably how good is it. Well, I'm very impressed. I tried it against a 24-70 2.8 the other day. Pixel peeping the 24-70 resolved more detail on my test (not massively), but it has less range and no VR. </p><p></p><p>I chose the 24-120 over the 24-70 when I went FX and it wasn't the cost that swung it. So far I'm pleased with the results and my decision. I'm probably going to get the 28-300 at some point as a true travel lens, even though I surprise myself that I don't miss the range that often.</p><p></p><p>Depending on your requirements the 24-70 may be the better choice, but not for my current use. </p><p></p><p>I went through a similar thought process between the 14-24 and the 16-35. I chose the latter because it better fitted my needs including taking filters and it's also a very sharp lens.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Geoffc, post: 137986, member: 8705"] I use the 24-120 more than anything else, it's as close to a replacement for my DX 18-200 (now sold although I keep regretting it) that I have at the moment. Your next question is probably how good is it. Well, I'm very impressed. I tried it against a 24-70 2.8 the other day. Pixel peeping the 24-70 resolved more detail on my test (not massively), but it has less range and no VR. I chose the 24-120 over the 24-70 when I went FX and it wasn't the cost that swung it. So far I'm pleased with the results and my decision. I'm probably going to get the 28-300 at some point as a true travel lens, even though I surprise myself that I don't miss the range that often. Depending on your requirements the 24-70 may be the better choice, but not for my current use. I went through a similar thought process between the 14-24 and the 16-35. I chose the latter because it better fitted my needs including taking filters and it's also a very sharp lens. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II
Top