Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bluenoser" data-source="post: 27670" data-attributes="member: 6351">Hmmm....I'm not seeing what the driving force behind this choice of FL was for Nikon.   They have lots of other gaps in their line-up but macro lenses seemed to be well covered with their newer lineup of 60, 85 and 105.  I'll be taking a pass on this one as I own the 60 2.8G and 35 1.8 (and didn't like the FL of the 50mm so I sold my 50 1.8).  The knock on the 60 2.8 is that for many it doesn't give enough working distance - that knock just got a lot louder for the 40 2.8.  Looks like Nikon Rumors missed the boat on this one! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>