Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bukitimah" data-source="post: 157386" data-attributes="member: 7507">I have the 70-300 VR and have not use the Tamron before. I only have the Tamron 17-50 non VR. From my experience, the Nikon lens is better but you pay much more for it.I have wanted to replace the 70-300 with the 70-200 VR but has not made the move mainly due to cost. I want the f2.8. What I wish to share here is that the 70-300 VR is value for money. The more you use it, the more you love it. I am beginning to feel that I don't need the f2.8 if my camera body can focus fast at low light with high ISO.So, if you are on budget, Nikon 70-300 VR is the lens to consider.</blockquote>