Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Nikon AF-S 70-300mm VR VS Tamron AF 70-300mm?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AC016" data-source="post: 157078" data-attributes="member: 9619"><p>Hey Kevin, Before buying the Tamron, i read many reviews, written and video and looked at the DXO numbers. The general consensus was that both lenses are excellent, but neither wins a knock out punch over the other. After my research was done, i also noticed that Tamron had a $100 rebate on the lens - which i just cashed in last week - and they also have a 6 year warranty. Therefore, along with the $100 rebate and the $125 i got for my 55-200, i was only paying about $230 for the Tamron. It was an easy decision for me. Besides, i am not married to Nikkor and as i continually read reviews of Tamron SP lenses and some of the Sigmas, Nikkor has some stiff competition. And the technical differences i was talking about are so minute, that they are not even worth while to talk about. Hope this helps</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AC016, post: 157078, member: 9619"] Hey Kevin, Before buying the Tamron, i read many reviews, written and video and looked at the DXO numbers. The general consensus was that both lenses are excellent, but neither wins a knock out punch over the other. After my research was done, i also noticed that Tamron had a $100 rebate on the lens - which i just cashed in last week - and they also have a 6 year warranty. Therefore, along with the $100 rebate and the $125 i got for my 55-200, i was only paying about $230 for the Tamron. It was an easy decision for me. Besides, i am not married to Nikkor and as i continually read reviews of Tamron SP lenses and some of the Sigmas, Nikkor has some stiff competition. And the technical differences i was talking about are so minute, that they are not even worth while to talk about. Hope this helps [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Nikon AF-S 70-300mm VR VS Tamron AF 70-300mm?
Top