Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Nikon AF Nikkor 24-120mm 3.5-5.6D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Clovishound" data-source="post: 823307" data-attributes="member: 50197"><p>If you already have the lens, it may be worth purchasing an FTZ. If you are looking at purchasing the lens, I would recommend looking very hard at a Z mount lens. IMO, it's worth spending the extra on the Z mount lenses, they really are a cut above. Having said that, there are situations where the comparable Z mount is a lot more than an F mount and the adapter. I don't regret getting the 200-500 F5.6 for my Z5. At the time, there were no long telephotos available in Z mount for less than about $2800. If I were buying now, I wouldn't hesitate to spend the extra for the Z 180-600.</p><p></p><p>FYI, the Z 24-120 F4 runs $1100 and is a constant aperture S line lens. The S line lenses are weather sealed, and generally better quality than standard lenses. I have no doubt you would be much happier with this lens, assuming you can afford to spend the extra on it. The lack of autofocus would be a deal killer for most folks these days, unless it is a specialty lens.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Clovishound, post: 823307, member: 50197"] If you already have the lens, it may be worth purchasing an FTZ. If you are looking at purchasing the lens, I would recommend looking very hard at a Z mount lens. IMO, it's worth spending the extra on the Z mount lenses, they really are a cut above. Having said that, there are situations where the comparable Z mount is a lot more than an F mount and the adapter. I don't regret getting the 200-500 F5.6 for my Z5. At the time, there were no long telephotos available in Z mount for less than about $2800. If I were buying now, I wouldn't hesitate to spend the extra for the Z 180-600. FYI, the Z 24-120 F4 runs $1100 and is a constant aperture S line lens. The S line lenses are weather sealed, and generally better quality than standard lenses. I have no doubt you would be much happier with this lens, assuming you can afford to spend the extra on it. The lack of autofocus would be a deal killer for most folks these days, unless it is a specialty lens. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Nikon AF Nikkor 24-120mm 3.5-5.6D
Top