Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Buy & Sell
Want to Buy
Nikon 80-200 mm AF-ED f/2.8 D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lawrence" data-source="post: 633681" data-attributes="member: 16844"><p>Brad - my Sigma is currently my best lens and I couldn't argue you with you except to say I think the 80-200 is sharper and produces even better bokeh.</p><p>A few other things make me want to switch:</p><p>One clearly is the reach</p><p>Two the 80-200 is a full frame lens (should I ever go that way)</p><p>I can get my money back on the Sigma and put about $500 dollars in my pocket or put towards some other gear.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #000000">Brent the dollars is an issue.</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">I had the 70-300 and was not that impressed with it because the aperture at the long end was too narrow.</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">The other lenses you mention are not an option at this stage due to finances.</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">I do appreciate the input though. I always like hearing what people have actually experienced.</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lawrence, post: 633681, member: 16844"] Brad - my Sigma is currently my best lens and I couldn't argue you with you except to say I think the 80-200 is sharper and produces even better bokeh. A few other things make me want to switch: One clearly is the reach Two the 80-200 is a full frame lens (should I ever go that way) I can get my money back on the Sigma and put about $500 dollars in my pocket or put towards some other gear. [COLOR=#000000]Brent the dollars is an issue. I had the 70-300 and was not that impressed with it because the aperture at the long end was too narrow. The other lenses you mention are not an option at this stage due to finances. I do appreciate the input though. I always like hearing what people have actually experienced. [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Buy & Sell
Want to Buy
Nikon 80-200 mm AF-ED f/2.8 D
Top