Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 70-200 f/4 vs a Sigma or Tamron 70-200 f/2.8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 496781" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>id also recommend the tamron 70-200 VC 2.8. my friend ditched 2 nikon 70-200 VR2 2.8 for the tamron. no joke. ill go to his house and do a video. I have the VR1. nice lens. I didnt upgrade to the VR2 only because of the heavy focus breathing it has. you cant compose as tight as the VR1. the reason one goes with 2.8 over 4 is not only because of more light/brighter VW, which btw, saved my ass many times when I had to shoot at 2.8 and my D3s was maxing out at iso 8000. the other reason is the creamier blur. just like someone goes for the 85 1.4 vs the 1.8 which is only 2/3 stops but shows in images. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]181522[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>the one whos leaning over is my friend who went to compete and he was watching some of the contests and was getting nervous. so basically no 2.8 I would been screwed. not the best quality image but acceptable and I got the shot. not with f/4 as youd have to underexpose and bump it in PP. and this was shot straight jpeg.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 496781, member: 14443"] id also recommend the tamron 70-200 VC 2.8. my friend ditched 2 nikon 70-200 VR2 2.8 for the tamron. no joke. ill go to his house and do a video. I have the VR1. nice lens. I didnt upgrade to the VR2 only because of the heavy focus breathing it has. you cant compose as tight as the VR1. the reason one goes with 2.8 over 4 is not only because of more light/brighter VW, which btw, saved my ass many times when I had to shoot at 2.8 and my D3s was maxing out at iso 8000. the other reason is the creamier blur. just like someone goes for the 85 1.4 vs the 1.8 which is only 2/3 stops but shows in images. [ATTACH=CONFIG]181522._xfImport[/ATTACH] the one whos leaning over is my friend who went to compete and he was watching some of the contests and was getting nervous. so basically no 2.8 I would been screwed. not the best quality image but acceptable and I got the shot. not with f/4 as youd have to underexpose and bump it in PP. and this was shot straight jpeg. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 70-200 f/4 vs a Sigma or Tamron 70-200 f/2.8
Top