Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 70-200 f/4 vs a Sigma or Tamron 70-200 f/2.8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="carguy" data-source="post: 496748" data-attributes="member: 12521"><p>Welcome to the community!</p><p></p><p>It really depends on what you are shooting or plan to shoot.</p><p></p><p>I went with the Tamron 70-200 f2.8 VC earlier this year. I shoot youth sports and concerts/music venues in dark conditions. The f2.8 was important to me.</p><p></p><p>It is usually mentioned that the Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 can be a good alternative as well, or even the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR (first version) which can sell for $1,000-1,200 USD in good used condition.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="carguy, post: 496748, member: 12521"] Welcome to the community! It really depends on what you are shooting or plan to shoot. I went with the Tamron 70-200 f2.8 VC earlier this year. I shoot youth sports and concerts/music venues in dark conditions. The f2.8 was important to me. It is usually mentioned that the Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 can be a good alternative as well, or even the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR (first version) which can sell for $1,000-1,200 USD in good used condition. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 70-200 f/4 vs a Sigma or Tamron 70-200 f/2.8
Top
