Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 55mm-200mm Questions!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ZekeMenuar" data-source="post: 48546" data-attributes="member: 8718"><p>I have the 55-200 VR and the 55-300 VR.</p><p></p><p>I really like the 55-200. I use it as a walk-around. It's light, fast and takes great shots. It's a very versatile lens. There are so many used ones out there I bought another one as a spare.</p><p></p><p>The 55-300 is a good lens. Takes great shots. I like having the extra range when needed. But, it is slow to auto-focus.</p><p>I found a refurb 55-300 for $269. At that price I couldn't pass it up. Within it's limitations it's a good lens but it's not as versatile as the 55-200.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ZekeMenuar, post: 48546, member: 8718"] I have the 55-200 VR and the 55-300 VR. I really like the 55-200. I use it as a walk-around. It's light, fast and takes great shots. It's a very versatile lens. There are so many used ones out there I bought another one as a spare. The 55-300 is a good lens. Takes great shots. I like having the extra range when needed. But, it is slow to auto-focus. I found a refurb 55-300 for $269. At that price I couldn't pass it up. Within it's limitations it's a good lens but it's not as versatile as the 55-200. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 55mm-200mm Questions!
Top