Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Nikon 55-300mm 4.5-5.6 G ED Dx
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 358198" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>Well, I'm not sure what there is to explain other than to say a prime lens, like your 35mm f/1.8 will, most often, be significantly sharper than a zoom lens. There are exceptions, there are always exceptions, but that being said, Photography is, most always, a juggling act and when it comes to lenses you typically juggle speed -- meaning maximum aperture -- against focal length against overall image quality. Can you have all three in one lens... One that's really fast, with a huge focal length and great edge-to-edge sharpness? Yes you can, but it will cost you; sometimes hugely, depending on just *how* fast you wanna go and just *how* sharp you want your images. It's easy to get into the "Thousands of Dollars" bracket... </p><p></p><p>Your 55-300mm is, to put it bluntly, a mediocre lens: It provides you a lot of flexibility and it's not all that expensive a lens; the tradeoff is in overall image quality.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #ffffff">....</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 358198, member: 13090"] Well, I'm not sure what there is to explain other than to say a prime lens, like your 35mm f/1.8 will, most often, be significantly sharper than a zoom lens. There are exceptions, there are always exceptions, but that being said, Photography is, most always, a juggling act and when it comes to lenses you typically juggle speed -- meaning maximum aperture -- against focal length against overall image quality. Can you have all three in one lens... One that's really fast, with a huge focal length and great edge-to-edge sharpness? Yes you can, but it will cost you; sometimes hugely, depending on just *how* fast you wanna go and just *how* sharp you want your images. It's easy to get into the "Thousands of Dollars" bracket... Your 55-300mm is, to put it bluntly, a mediocre lens: It provides you a lot of flexibility and it's not all that expensive a lens; the tradeoff is in overall image quality. [COLOR=#ffffff]....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Nikon 55-300mm 4.5-5.6 G ED Dx
Top