Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 55-200 vs Sigma 50-200
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bluenoser" data-source="post: 49588" data-attributes="member: 6351"><p>Hi. I believe you mentioned that you hadn't picked up your camera and kit lens yet? (sorry if I've got this wrong). What I'd recommend is that you not get the 18-55 and get the 18-105VR instead. It's a better, more versatile lens that the 18-55 and can be had for a reasonable price in the used market (a very plentiful supply). Frankly if I had to choose between the 2 set-ups, I'd rather have only the 18-105VR than the 18-55 + the 55-200VR. Having the 18-105VR I would then try to save up and get the 70-300VR (or at least the 55-300VR) and pass on the 55-200VR (I frankly don't think much of that lens either). In my strong opinion, that would give you better coverage (I prefer a little overlap between lenses) and better quality lenses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bluenoser, post: 49588, member: 6351"] Hi. I believe you mentioned that you hadn't picked up your camera and kit lens yet? (sorry if I've got this wrong). What I'd recommend is that you not get the 18-55 and get the 18-105VR instead. It's a better, more versatile lens that the 18-55 and can be had for a reasonable price in the used market (a very plentiful supply). Frankly if I had to choose between the 2 set-ups, I'd rather have only the 18-105VR than the 18-55 + the 55-200VR. Having the 18-105VR I would then try to save up and get the 70-300VR (or at least the 55-300VR) and pass on the 55-200VR (I frankly don't think much of that lens either). In my strong opinion, that would give you better coverage (I prefer a little overlap between lenses) and better quality lenses. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 55-200 vs Sigma 50-200
Top