Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 55-200 vs Sigma 50-200
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ZekeMenuar" data-source="post: 49580" data-attributes="member: 8718"><p>I suffered a bout of "gotta have 300MM" disease. Then Adorama had a refurb 55-300mm VR for $269.</p><p></p><p>Nice lens. Having the extra range is real nice, takes great pictures.....but....It's slow to auto-focus. </p><p>Great for some things but not as versatile as the 55-200 VR.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ZekeMenuar, post: 49580, member: 8718"] I suffered a bout of "gotta have 300MM" disease. Then Adorama had a refurb 55-300mm VR for $269. Nice lens. Having the extra range is real nice, takes great pictures.....but....It's slow to auto-focus. Great for some things but not as versatile as the 55-200 VR. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 55-200 vs Sigma 50-200
Top
