Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX or Nikon 40mm f/2.8G AF-S DX Micro
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="skene" data-source="post: 146623" data-attributes="member: 13155"><p>Both the 40mm 2.8G and the 35mm 1.8G will both be good lenses. However owning both, I would go with the 40mm 2.8G as it is a decent all around lens. Much better doing portraits vs the 35 and the ability to get up close and super personal with macro shots. While the 35mm 1.8G will be better in low light situations, it shouldn't be the end all as the 40mm is somewhat decent as well.</p><p>The only one gripe that I have with the 40mm is that it is a much slower lens to AF, but if/when you are working on a stationary object MF may be easier to control.</p><p>The bokeh is amazing on the 40mm and really you would have nothing to lose.</p><p></p><p>You should however bring your camera with you to your local camera shop and try out both lenses so that you can see what you really are missing. However I don't think you would miss much from not picking the 35mm. </p><p></p><p>My 35mm 1.8G stays in my bag 90% of the time. I get more use on the 50mm 1.8D and 40mm 2.8G.</p><p></p><p>GL.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="skene, post: 146623, member: 13155"] Both the 40mm 2.8G and the 35mm 1.8G will both be good lenses. However owning both, I would go with the 40mm 2.8G as it is a decent all around lens. Much better doing portraits vs the 35 and the ability to get up close and super personal with macro shots. While the 35mm 1.8G will be better in low light situations, it shouldn't be the end all as the 40mm is somewhat decent as well. The only one gripe that I have with the 40mm is that it is a much slower lens to AF, but if/when you are working on a stationary object MF may be easier to control. The bokeh is amazing on the 40mm and really you would have nothing to lose. You should however bring your camera with you to your local camera shop and try out both lenses so that you can see what you really are missing. However I don't think you would miss much from not picking the 35mm. My 35mm 1.8G stays in my bag 90% of the time. I get more use on the 50mm 1.8D and 40mm 2.8G. GL. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX or Nikon 40mm f/2.8G AF-S DX Micro
Top