Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Nikon 35mm; 50mm; 85mm Article
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 226957" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">The 35mm vs. 50mm lens debate rages on and both sides have good arguments in support of their side. Simply put, the 15mm difference between the two lenses is simply *NOT* a deal breaker in any practical sense. We could all re-hash the whole DX vs. FX perspective thing but that just muddies the water with yet another meaningless comparison (if you're not familiar with the particulars of the FX vs DX format debate, count a blessing but, on the flip side of that coin, neither should you worry about this gaping hole in your photographic knowledge base because SOMEONE will simply NOT be able to resist bringing this "argument" to the table). </span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">The short answer to your question is that both the 35mm focal length AND the 50mm focal length are GREAT focal lengths to have and neither of the lenses in question is inherently superior to the other; they will both provide you excellent bokeh, both are fast at f/1.8 and both will provide you with excellent sharpness. Buy one, buy the other, buy them both. They're both really good lenses.</span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">Lastly, the 85mm f/1.8G is, in my opinion, a really *fantastic* lens.</span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #FFFFFF">.....</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 226957, member: 13090"] [LEFT][COLOR=#000000] The 35mm vs. 50mm lens debate rages on and both sides have good arguments in support of their side. Simply put, the 15mm difference between the two lenses is simply *NOT* a deal breaker in any practical sense. We could all re-hash the whole DX vs. FX perspective thing but that just muddies the water with yet another meaningless comparison (if you're not familiar with the particulars of the FX vs DX format debate, count a blessing but, on the flip side of that coin, neither should you worry about this gaping hole in your photographic knowledge base because SOMEONE will simply NOT be able to resist bringing this "argument" to the table). The short answer to your question is that both the 35mm focal length AND the 50mm focal length are GREAT focal lengths to have and neither of the lenses in question is inherently superior to the other; they will both provide you excellent bokeh, both are fast at f/1.8 and both will provide you with excellent sharpness. Buy one, buy the other, buy them both. They're both really good lenses. Lastly, the 85mm f/1.8G is, in my opinion, a really *fantastic* lens. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"].....[/COLOR][/color][/left] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Nikon 35mm; 50mm; 85mm Article
Top