Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Nikon 24-70 question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="singlerosa_RIP" data-source="post: 359588" data-attributes="member: 15556"><p>I've had my Nikon 24-70 for 18 months. It replaced the 17-55 when I went FX and is my most used lens (out of 7). With the high ISO capabilities of today's cameras, I have no issues with non-VR lenses (I only have 2). I can count on one hand the number of times I use VR on my 70-200. If Nikon came out with a 24-70 VR tomorrow, I would not be in a hurry to buy it unless the optics were far superior to the current lens, while maintaining equal or better build quality (metal).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="singlerosa_RIP, post: 359588, member: 15556"] I've had my Nikon 24-70 for 18 months. It replaced the 17-55 when I went FX and is my most used lens (out of 7). With the high ISO capabilities of today's cameras, I have no issues with non-VR lenses (I only have 2). I can count on one hand the number of times I use VR on my 70-200. If Nikon came out with a 24-70 VR tomorrow, I would not be in a hurry to buy it unless the optics were far superior to the current lens, while maintaining equal or better build quality (metal). [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Nikon 24-70 question
Top