Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="salukfan111" data-source="post: 537003" data-attributes="member: 39212">The only downside it has is the weight.  Check out the flickr pages.  If you own a 15-30 already, then a 20 f/1.8 probably wouldn't be necessary unless you want a featherlight lens or need it for astro.  I've never shot a 14-24 before, but many Nikon fanboys indicate the 15-30 is better as well.Before you plunk down major dollars you ought to borrow or rent the 15-30, 20mm f/1.8, and the 20 and 28mm Voiglanders.  Nikon has an older lens lens that is too expensive for them to make and get a profit that you may like as well (20-35mm) that is available for 600 bucks.  Find yourself a camera buddy in your area and borrow lens.</blockquote>