Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="brian313313" data-source="post: 597048" data-attributes="member: 11888"><p>I have been getting more into photography and want to get a lens with more reach. This is mostly for wildlife. I also shoot sports, but I'm too close to need a zoom although that could change as I branch out. I was planning on the Nikon 200-500mm (new), but am debating the 300mm prime with a teleconverter (used). Even with the new vs. used, the 300 option will be a lot more expensive. I'm still planning on at least VR AF-S options. I have the budget but I'm not sure if I'm going to be much better on the long end. I have not been able to find anything comparing these directly. I think this is because they are quite different options. Thanks for any feedback.</p></blockquote><p></p>