Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 200-500 filter issue
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 633450" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>95mm filters are going to be costly for anything decent, so stand by for some potential "sticker shock". </p><p></p><p>The best option, IMO, would be a filter from Breakthrough Photography. Their <a href="https://www.amazon.com/95mm-Filter-Camera-Lenses-Weather-Sealed/dp/B06XWSLPDW/ref=sr_1_7?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1502211639&sr=1-7" target="_blank">95mm UV filter</a> will set you back $149.</p><p></p><p>A less expensive option would the <a href="https://www.amazon.com/95mm-Clear-Haze-Multi-Resistant-Coating/dp/B0000BZLCL/ref=sr_1_4?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1502211639&sr=1-4" target="_blank">B+W 95mm UV filter</a> for $84. </p><p></p><p>Waving off any potential static from anyone who might feel compelled to point it out... I am fully aware digital cameras do not need UV protection, but that's about your only option for a protective filter of 95mm. Hoya is set to release 95mm HD Protectors, but I don't think they've actually hit the street yet. And yes, there are other brands that meet your needs, but none I'm willing to actually *suggest* (Fotasy, Polaroid, et al (you bets yer money and you takes yer chances)). I love my Hoya HD protectors, and recommend them highly, so if you're interested you might try contacting Hoya directly with questions about availability.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 633450, member: 13090"] 95mm filters are going to be costly for anything decent, so stand by for some potential "sticker shock". The best option, IMO, would be a filter from Breakthrough Photography. Their [url=https://www.amazon.com/95mm-Filter-Camera-Lenses-Weather-Sealed/dp/B06XWSLPDW/ref=sr_1_7?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1502211639&sr=1-7]95mm UV filter[/url] will set you back $149. A less expensive option would the [url=https://www.amazon.com/95mm-Clear-Haze-Multi-Resistant-Coating/dp/B0000BZLCL/ref=sr_1_4?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1502211639&sr=1-4]B+W 95mm UV filter[/url] for $84. Waving off any potential static from anyone who might feel compelled to point it out... I am fully aware digital cameras do not need UV protection, but that's about your only option for a protective filter of 95mm. Hoya is set to release 95mm HD Protectors, but I don't think they've actually hit the street yet. And yes, there are other brands that meet your needs, but none I'm willing to actually *suggest* (Fotasy, Polaroid, et al (you bets yer money and you takes yer chances)). I love my Hoya HD protectors, and recommend them highly, so if you're interested you might try contacting Hoya directly with questions about availability. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 200-500 filter issue
Top