Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 18-200 zoom or ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DraganDL" data-source="post: 286183" data-attributes="member: 18251"><p>Don't expect any wonders if you switch some of the "off brands", like, say, Tamron 18-200mm 3.5-6.3 for Nikon 18-200 AF-S 3.5-5.6. In some aspects, the thing would be even worse (barrel distortion at 18mm are MORE pronounced on Nikon's 18-200mm)... Sigma's 18-200mm is lagging behind both. However, what could be gained is already on the paper - the difference between f/5.6 and f/6.3 at the longest end, and, related to that, somewhat better AF results in the low light situations. But, at the huge price difference.</p><p></p><p>What I think worth considering is the full frame lens, like 28-200mm (AF-D or "G", maybe), since anyway, your wife is more up to telephoto end (so that the gap between 18mm and 28mm wouldn't be the issue here). These lenses (AF-D as well as the newer "G" type) are superior to aforementioned 3 lenses in terms of a sheer optical and build qualities and might be even more affordable nowadays.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DraganDL, post: 286183, member: 18251"] Don't expect any wonders if you switch some of the "off brands", like, say, Tamron 18-200mm 3.5-6.3 for Nikon 18-200 AF-S 3.5-5.6. In some aspects, the thing would be even worse (barrel distortion at 18mm are MORE pronounced on Nikon's 18-200mm)... Sigma's 18-200mm is lagging behind both. However, what could be gained is already on the paper - the difference between f/5.6 and f/6.3 at the longest end, and, related to that, somewhat better AF results in the low light situations. But, at the huge price difference. What I think worth considering is the full frame lens, like 28-200mm (AF-D or "G", maybe), since anyway, your wife is more up to telephoto end (so that the gap between 18mm and 28mm wouldn't be the issue here). These lenses (AF-D as well as the newer "G" type) are superior to aforementioned 3 lenses in terms of a sheer optical and build qualities and might be even more affordable nowadays. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 18-200 zoom or ?
Top