Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 384605" data-attributes="member: 31330">Who cares it's not as sharp as the pro line. I'm never gonna shoot the &quot;sell your grandmother first&quot; lenses so there's none of those to compare it to. I shoot at 7.1 and it's doing a good job. Certainly for that price. My 200mm is sharper on my D750 but that's of little use since I can't crop a dot into a monster.If you want a review and pictures: <a href="http://erkesphoto.com/photography-technique/tamron-150-600-f5-0-6-3-lens-test-nikon-mount-2/" target="_blank">Tamron 150-600 lens test</a>I'd call that sharp enough. If I have a good day and it is a good day I see a similar result once in a while. Not often but that's because I still suck at shooting this kind of lens.I bought that 200mm based upon numbers. The fact it had breathing room helped too. But even while it wasn't the sharpest lens for the D3300 and not the cheapest, the numbers indicated that the better the cam, the more that lens would shine. After I got the D750 it turned out the numbers were correct.A scientific method might not say much about a lot of factors but it'll tell more about the qualities of a lens than the opinion of some dude that shot some. That's also why we no longer go to shamans when feeling sick.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="J-see, post: 384605, member: 31330"] Who cares it's not as sharp as the pro line. I'm never gonna shoot the [I]"sell your grandmother first"[/I] lenses so there's none of those to compare it to. I shoot at 7.1 and it's doing a good job. Certainly for that price. My 200mm is sharper on my D750 but that's of little use since I can't crop a dot into a monster. If you want a review and pictures: [url=http://erkesphoto.com/photography-technique/tamron-150-600-f5-0-6-3-lens-test-nikon-mount-2/]Tamron 150-600 lens test[/url] I'd call that sharp enough. If I have a good day and it is a good day I see a similar result once in a while. Not often but that's because I still suck at shooting this kind of lens. I bought that 200mm based upon numbers. The fact it had breathing room helped too. But even while it wasn't the sharpest lens for the D3300 and not the cheapest, the numbers indicated that the better the cam, the more that lens would shine. After I got the D750 it turned out the numbers were correct. A scientific method might not say much about a lot of factors but it'll tell more about the qualities of a lens than the opinion of some dude that shot some. That's also why we no longer go to shamans when feeling sick. [/QUOTE]

Verification