Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Nikon 16mm-35mm f/4 vs. 18mm-35mm f/3.5-4.5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 384530" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>because its just numbers. reminds me of photodo.com of the film days when an mtf number would decide if a person bought a lens or not. most here probably dont even remember or know what im talking about.</p><p></p><p>there was another website where people inputted number for the lens from the wide angle shot open and stopped down aperture and the same on the tele side of the lens. everyone who had this lens gave an input and it was rounded off. this is how people bought their lenses. based on numbers of others people. what dumb people in this world. </p><p></p><p>one lens a certain number, another lens a different number and so its better. but thats just a small detail in how it really performs. </p><p></p><p>specs on anything give an idication but cannot give a true picture of what a lens does and how it performs. there are many other criteria.</p><p></p><p>the 85 1.4 and 1.8G lenses have the 1.4 as a higher number than the 1.8 where in actuality, the 1.8 is sharper at open aperture compared to the 1.4</p><p></p><p>same with the D610 D750 </p><p><a href="http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Nikon-D750-versus-Nikon-D610___975_915" target="_blank">Nikon D750 versus Nikon D610 - Side by side camera comparison - DxOMark</a></p><p></p><p>from the rave reviews, the D750 is clearly superior but yet its speced as the same as the D610 (more or less) </p><p></p><p>they have no credebility in my eyes. just SH**.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 384530, member: 14443"] because its just numbers. reminds me of photodo.com of the film days when an mtf number would decide if a person bought a lens or not. most here probably dont even remember or know what im talking about. there was another website where people inputted number for the lens from the wide angle shot open and stopped down aperture and the same on the tele side of the lens. everyone who had this lens gave an input and it was rounded off. this is how people bought their lenses. based on numbers of others people. what dumb people in this world. one lens a certain number, another lens a different number and so its better. but thats just a small detail in how it really performs. specs on anything give an idication but cannot give a true picture of what a lens does and how it performs. there are many other criteria. the 85 1.4 and 1.8G lenses have the 1.4 as a higher number than the 1.8 where in actuality, the 1.8 is sharper at open aperture compared to the 1.4 same with the D610 D750 [URL="http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Nikon-D750-versus-Nikon-D610___975_915"]Nikon D750 versus Nikon D610 - Side by side camera comparison - DxOMark[/URL] from the rave reviews, the D750 is clearly superior but yet its speced as the same as the D610 (more or less) they have no credebility in my eyes. just SH**. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Nikon 16mm-35mm f/4 vs. 18mm-35mm f/3.5-4.5
Top
