Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Nikon 16mm-35mm f/4 vs. 18mm-35mm f/3.5-4.5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scott Ramsey" data-source="post: 384326" data-attributes="member: 23981"><p>I am looking for some real world advice on which of these lenses to buy for landscapes. Other than the obvious price and range difference, I am finding conflicting reviews. Rockwell says they are basically identical in performance; Dxomark scores the 18-35 at 25 vs. 22 for the 16-35; Camera Labs seems to think the 18-35 is a better lens; and the list goes on. What do you guys think? I would even be open to hearing about comparable non-Nikkor lenses.</p><p>thanks</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scott Ramsey, post: 384326, member: 23981"] I am looking for some real world advice on which of these lenses to buy for landscapes. Other than the obvious price and range difference, I am finding conflicting reviews. Rockwell says they are basically identical in performance; Dxomark scores the 18-35 at 25 vs. 22 for the 16-35; Camera Labs seems to think the 18-35 is a better lens; and the list goes on. What do you guys think? I would even be open to hearing about comparable non-Nikkor lenses. thanks [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Nikon 16mm-35mm f/4 vs. 18mm-35mm f/3.5-4.5
Top
