Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Nikon 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S VS Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Skytalker" data-source="post: 173917" data-attributes="member: 15613"><p>17-55 is the best DX zoom. </p><p>No tamron 17-50 or Nikon 16-85 compares with it. The tamron is very slow focusing even hunting in low light, but the quality of images is good (the no VC version). 16-85 is somewhat faster focussing but lacks the f 2.8 aperture that is important to some people. But then it has VR so in case you film a lot, that comes very handy.</p><p></p><p>Now-days with the level of high ISO performance of the 7000 and 7100 there is no need to go FX as it was in the past, to have good images at high ISO. If budget is no problem I would definitely go for the 17-55, I might very well consider a second hand one. But then you can get stunning images with the other 2 as well. So whatever you choose is good.</p><p>Hope it helps.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Skytalker, post: 173917, member: 15613"] 17-55 is the best DX zoom. No tamron 17-50 or Nikon 16-85 compares with it. The tamron is very slow focusing even hunting in low light, but the quality of images is good (the no VC version). 16-85 is somewhat faster focussing but lacks the f 2.8 aperture that is important to some people. But then it has VR so in case you film a lot, that comes very handy. Now-days with the level of high ISO performance of the 7000 and 7100 there is no need to go FX as it was in the past, to have good images at high ISO. If budget is no problem I would definitely go for the 17-55, I might very well consider a second hand one. But then you can get stunning images with the other 2 as well. So whatever you choose is good. Hope it helps. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Nikon 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S VS Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S
Top