Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Nikon 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S VS Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ironwood" data-source="post: 173441" data-attributes="member: 10447"><p>I recently bought a 16-85. I researched quite a few lenses before I decided on this one, I briefly thought about the 17-55, but because of the price, lack of VR, and less zoom range, I ruled it out pretty quickly.</p><p>I also considered offerings from Sigma and Tamron, I was very tempted by their lenses, the prices were right, VR was available, as was f2.8.</p><p>But in the end I went with the 16-85 Nikon, there were just too many good user reviews out there for this lens. </p><p></p><p>I am happy with my decision, for me the VR makes up for the smaller aperture, and the range covers my needs for a walkaround lens. </p><p>But your mileage may vary.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ironwood, post: 173441, member: 10447"] I recently bought a 16-85. I researched quite a few lenses before I decided on this one, I briefly thought about the 17-55, but because of the price, lack of VR, and less zoom range, I ruled it out pretty quickly. I also considered offerings from Sigma and Tamron, I was very tempted by their lenses, the prices were right, VR was available, as was f2.8. But in the end I went with the 16-85 Nikon, there were just too many good user reviews out there for this lens. I am happy with my decision, for me the VR makes up for the smaller aperture, and the range covers my needs for a walkaround lens. But your mileage may vary. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Nikon 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S VS Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S
Top