Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Nikon 16-35mm or 18-35mm
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nononadanope" data-source="post: 314545" data-attributes="member: 25260"><p>Okay, so the current lenses I have now are a Nikon 28mm 2.8D and a Tamron 28-75mm 2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro Zoom. I'm looking to get a new lens in the future, one with a focal length starting between 16-20mm. The ones I'm looking at are the <span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica'">Nikon AF-S Nikkor 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G ED or the </span></span><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica'">Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR. Now I know there is a price difference between the two. The 18-35 being around $750 and the 16-35 being around $1,250. Is the price difference worth it? Which lens would suit me better? I would mostly use the lens for photographing things such as cars and motorcycles (Not action shots). I'm open to any other options as well. Although, I will put this out here now. I use to have a Sigma 12-24mm but didn't like it that much because it would distort the image more than I wanted, even though it was a sharp lens.</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nononadanope, post: 314545, member: 25260"] Okay, so the current lenses I have now are a Nikon 28mm 2.8D and a Tamron 28-75mm 2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro Zoom. I'm looking to get a new lens in the future, one with a focal length starting between 16-20mm. The ones I'm looking at are the [COLOR=#000000][FONT=Helvetica]Nikon AF-S Nikkor 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G ED or the [/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Helvetica]Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR. Now I know there is a price difference between the two. The 18-35 being around $750 and the 16-35 being around $1,250. Is the price difference worth it? Which lens would suit me better? I would mostly use the lens for photographing things such as cars and motorcycles (Not action shots). I'm open to any other options as well. Although, I will put this out here now. I use to have a Sigma 12-24mm but didn't like it that much because it would distort the image more than I wanted, even though it was a sharp lens.[/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Wide-Angle
Nikon 16-35mm or 18-35mm
Top