Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 105mm Macro as a tele?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gqtuazon" data-source="post: 101913" data-attributes="member: 6573"><p>Hi Rick. Here are the sample shots that I took today. They are not the greatest samples that you've seen but I took them just to give you an idea. Both were taken in Aperture mode @ f8, ISO 100, 1/50 - 1/60, VR off, no flash, both were taken on a Tripod, D800E, Mirror up feature to minimize mirror slap vibration. </p><p></p><p>The 70-200mm f2.8 VRII was mounted on it's lens foot and the tripod was re-adjusted to give it a similar field of view. Both images were taken from the NEF file converted to jpg and resized to 1050 x 701 for web posting. The single focus point was on the blue mini van. The crop images are at 100% view. I couldn't even see or read the license plates of the vehicles except when I viewed them on my computer. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /> The distance is about 200 meters (give or take a few).</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure if this will help answer your curiosity. Sharpness wise, I think they are ok. If you use them for portrait shots, they will be very sharp.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://i824.photobucket.com/albums/zz169/gqtuazon/70-200mmf28VR105_zps5116ae99.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p><img src="http://i824.photobucket.com/albums/zz169/gqtuazon/Nikon105mmVR_zps5862b314.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p><img src="http://i824.photobucket.com/albums/zz169/gqtuazon/Nikon105mmVRcrop_zpsaa8d0a5f.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p><img src="http://i824.photobucket.com/albums/zz169/gqtuazon/70-200mmf2_zpsa96642df.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gqtuazon, post: 101913, member: 6573"] Hi Rick. Here are the sample shots that I took today. They are not the greatest samples that you've seen but I took them just to give you an idea. Both were taken in Aperture mode @ f8, ISO 100, 1/50 - 1/60, VR off, no flash, both were taken on a Tripod, D800E, Mirror up feature to minimize mirror slap vibration. The 70-200mm f2.8 VRII was mounted on it's lens foot and the tripod was re-adjusted to give it a similar field of view. Both images were taken from the NEF file converted to jpg and resized to 1050 x 701 for web posting. The single focus point was on the blue mini van. The crop images are at 100% view. I couldn't even see or read the license plates of the vehicles except when I viewed them on my computer. :cool: The distance is about 200 meters (give or take a few). I'm not sure if this will help answer your curiosity. Sharpness wise, I think they are ok. If you use them for portrait shots, they will be very sharp. [IMG]http://i824.photobucket.com/albums/zz169/gqtuazon/70-200mmf28VR105_zps5116ae99.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i824.photobucket.com/albums/zz169/gqtuazon/Nikon105mmVR_zps5862b314.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i824.photobucket.com/albums/zz169/gqtuazon/Nikon105mmVRcrop_zpsaa8d0a5f.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i824.photobucket.com/albums/zz169/gqtuazon/70-200mmf2_zpsa96642df.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon 105mm Macro as a tele?
Top
