Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Nikon 105mm f2.8 VRI lens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="egosbar" data-source="post: 278454" data-attributes="member: 19871"><p>been looking at this one for the last few weeks to use with my d7100, ive got no doubt its a great lens as shows with some really nice shots posted , my question is though is it worth the extra $500 dollars then the tamron 90mm 2.8 which has some really good write ups , </p><p></p><p>is a nice 4-500 dollar tripod and the tamron a better choice then the 105mm as i dont have a tripod yet and will obviously be needing one </p><p></p><p>or a tamron 90mm and a tokina 11-16mm 2.8 for roughly the same price as the 105mm</p><p></p><p>i love all photography and really looking forward too stepping into the world of macro , i do want too shoot bugs etc as well as flowers , i really love landscapes as well so the 11-16 would be a nice addition at the moment i have a 55-300vr , 18-55 vr and a 1.8 prime 50mm</p><p></p><p>thoughts would be appreciated and i have read in some reviews the tamron is a better lens then the nikon or at worst there is very little between them, i expect it too be better built etc as mentioned in reviews but it is pricy compared to the tamron</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="egosbar, post: 278454, member: 19871"] been looking at this one for the last few weeks to use with my d7100, ive got no doubt its a great lens as shows with some really nice shots posted , my question is though is it worth the extra $500 dollars then the tamron 90mm 2.8 which has some really good write ups , is a nice 4-500 dollar tripod and the tamron a better choice then the 105mm as i dont have a tripod yet and will obviously be needing one or a tamron 90mm and a tokina 11-16mm 2.8 for roughly the same price as the 105mm i love all photography and really looking forward too stepping into the world of macro , i do want too shoot bugs etc as well as flowers , i really love landscapes as well so the 11-16 would be a nice addition at the moment i have a 55-300vr , 18-55 vr and a 1.8 prime 50mm thoughts would be appreciated and i have read in some reviews the tamron is a better lens then the nikon or at worst there is very little between them, i expect it too be better built etc as mentioned in reviews but it is pricy compared to the tamron [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Nikon 105mm f2.8 VRI lens
Top