Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="egosbar" data-source="post: 278454" data-attributes="member: 19871">been looking at this one for the last few weeks to use with my d7100, ive got no doubt its a great lens as shows with some really nice shots posted , my question is though is it worth the extra $500 dollars then the tamron 90mm 2.8 which has some really good write ups , is a nice 4-500 dollar tripod and the tamron a better choice then the 105mm as i dont have a tripod yet and will obviously be needing one or a tamron 90mm and a tokina 11-16mm 2.8 for roughly the same price as the 105mmi love all photography and really looking forward too stepping into the world of macro , i do want too shoot bugs etc as well as flowers , i really love landscapes as well so the 11-16 would be a nice addition at the moment i have a 55-300vr , 18-55 vr and a 1.8 prime 50mmthoughts would be appreciated and i have read in some reviews the tamron is a better lens then the nikon or at worst there is very little between them, i expect it too be better built etc as mentioned in reviews but it is pricy compared to the tamron</blockquote>

[QUOTE="egosbar, post: 278454, member: 19871"] been looking at this one for the last few weeks to use with my d7100, ive got no doubt its a great lens as shows with some really nice shots posted , my question is though is it worth the extra $500 dollars then the tamron 90mm 2.8 which has some really good write ups , is a nice 4-500 dollar tripod and the tamron a better choice then the 105mm as i dont have a tripod yet and will obviously be needing one or a tamron 90mm and a tokina 11-16mm 2.8 for roughly the same price as the 105mm i love all photography and really looking forward too stepping into the world of macro , i do want too shoot bugs etc as well as flowers , i really love landscapes as well so the 11-16 would be a nice addition at the moment i have a 55-300vr , 18-55 vr and a 1.8 prime 50mm thoughts would be appreciated and i have read in some reviews the tamron is a better lens then the nikon or at worst there is very little between them, i expect it too be better built etc as mentioned in reviews but it is pricy compared to the tamron [/QUOTE]

Verification