Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Nikon 105 mm macro 2.8 vs 85 f.1.8 vs 85 macro f.3.5 for portrait?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Feddyll" data-source="post: 737666" data-attributes="member: 48423"><p>Hi. I own the Nikon 105 2.8d. And i also have the 85 1.8d. The both of them are great lenses. I will say i.m.o. As good as the 105 is. The 85, is a better lens for portraits. There is a certain character to the old Nikon d lenses. Both are good, but i would use the 85, for portraits. It renders a better out of focus background. Surely everyone talks about bokeh. But if you have a good subject i believe the image will speak more about you as a photographer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Feddyll, post: 737666, member: 48423"] Hi. I own the Nikon 105 2.8d. And i also have the 85 1.8d. The both of them are great lenses. I will say i.m.o. As good as the 105 is. The 85, is a better lens for portraits. There is a certain character to the old Nikon d lenses. Both are good, but i would use the 85, for portraits. It renders a better out of focus background. Surely everyone talks about bokeh. But if you have a good subject i believe the image will speak more about you as a photographer. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Nikon 105 mm macro 2.8 vs 85 f.1.8 vs 85 macro f.3.5 for portrait?
Top