Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikkor DX 300 or older Sigma DL 300 on a D610
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fortkentdad" data-source="post: 324935" data-attributes="member: 24285"><p>I have two longer lenses that shoot up to 300mm. A Nikkor AF-S 55-300 DX VR that I bought with my D5100 two years ago, and a Sigma 100-300mm F4.5-6.7 AF-DL that I bought about 14 years ago with my F60. I used the Siggy on a trip to Scotland and at the time was very pleased with the results. But after a while the cost of developing among other things gradually reduced my use of the F60 and then I got a Fuji Digital and the rest is history for my F60. Now it sits in it's box waiting to become an antique. </p><p></p><p>When I got the D5100 I had hopes of using the Siggy 300 but alas it did not autofocus and I was swayed to buy the newer Nikkor with "VR". I used that lens in the past two years and have been happy with it. The Siggy collected more dust.</p><p></p><p>Now I have a D610 and pulled out the Siggy again. I did some testing and expected the IQ from the Nikkor with VR to be better than the Siggy because of the VR - but I think the greater resolution of the FX Siggy lens wins the day. </p><p></p><p>Because I expect to use this both hand held and on tripod I tried to test the IQ hand held. Picked a rather bland view of the end of my old garage but it serves the purpose. I let the D610 autocrop for a DX lens. Other than that the settings were pretty much the same, F/8 in aperture priority. I took several shots and picked the best - there wasn't much difference. </p><p></p><p> First one is the Nikkor, Second the Siggy. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]97970[/ATTACH][ATTACH]97971[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p></p><p>I understand there are better lenses than this old Siggy but for my purposes and pocket book for now it will be my long lens. Thought of buying a different "less expensive" aka cheapo, long lens but I don't want to spend over $200 and from what I can tell what I can afford at the moment won't be much better than the Siggy I have. </p><p></p><p>If I was to replace my Siggy what would you recommend? </p><p></p><p>If cheap enough maybe sooner rather than later - either that or I start hinting at what Santa can bring me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fortkentdad, post: 324935, member: 24285"] I have two longer lenses that shoot up to 300mm. A Nikkor AF-S 55-300 DX VR that I bought with my D5100 two years ago, and a Sigma 100-300mm F4.5-6.7 AF-DL that I bought about 14 years ago with my F60. I used the Siggy on a trip to Scotland and at the time was very pleased with the results. But after a while the cost of developing among other things gradually reduced my use of the F60 and then I got a Fuji Digital and the rest is history for my F60. Now it sits in it's box waiting to become an antique. When I got the D5100 I had hopes of using the Siggy 300 but alas it did not autofocus and I was swayed to buy the newer Nikkor with "VR". I used that lens in the past two years and have been happy with it. The Siggy collected more dust. Now I have a D610 and pulled out the Siggy again. I did some testing and expected the IQ from the Nikkor with VR to be better than the Siggy because of the VR - but I think the greater resolution of the FX Siggy lens wins the day. Because I expect to use this both hand held and on tripod I tried to test the IQ hand held. Picked a rather bland view of the end of my old garage but it serves the purpose. I let the D610 autocrop for a DX lens. Other than that the settings were pretty much the same, F/8 in aperture priority. I took several shots and picked the best - there wasn't much difference. First one is the Nikkor, Second the Siggy. [ATTACH=CONFIG]97970._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]97971._xfImport[/ATTACH] I understand there are better lenses than this old Siggy but for my purposes and pocket book for now it will be my long lens. Thought of buying a different "less expensive" aka cheapo, long lens but I don't want to spend over $200 and from what I can tell what I can afford at the moment won't be much better than the Siggy I have. If I was to replace my Siggy what would you recommend? If cheap enough maybe sooner rather than later - either that or I start hinting at what Santa can bring me. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikkor DX 300 or older Sigma DL 300 on a D610
Top