Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikkor AF-S 400mm f2.8 II D ED IF Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whiskeyman" data-source="post: 298483" data-attributes="member: 13556"><p>Thanks for responding, Patrick. I was referring to a different version of the 300 mm; the D II, not the G VR which both of your links point to. It was a direct comparison of both these lenses that indicated that the D II wouldn't work with all of the FX sensor. <a href="http://camera-lenses.findthebest.com/compare/162-311/Nikon-AF-S-400mm-f-2-8D-IF-ED-II-vs-Nikon-AF-S-NIKKOR-400mm-f-2-8G-ED-VR" target="_blank">Nikon AF-S 400mm f/2.8D IF-ED II vs Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 400mm f/2.8G ED VR - Camer...</a> is the link with the questionable information. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I wholly agree Sparky. There likely wouldn't be very many sales of such a lens unless it were far less expensive than these focal lengths tend to be.</p><p></p><p>Thanks to both of you for responding! I have now found a source that definitively says that this lens is a full-frame lens: <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/products/nikon/lenses/nikon_400_2p8d_ii" target="_blank">Nikon AF-S Nikkor 400mm f/2.8D ED-IF II: Digital Photography Review</a></p><p></p><p>WM</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whiskeyman, post: 298483, member: 13556"] Thanks for responding, Patrick. I was referring to a different version of the 300 mm; the D II, not the G VR which both of your links point to. It was a direct comparison of both these lenses that indicated that the D II wouldn't work with all of the FX sensor. [url=http://camera-lenses.findthebest.com/compare/162-311/Nikon-AF-S-400mm-f-2-8D-IF-ED-II-vs-Nikon-AF-S-NIKKOR-400mm-f-2-8G-ED-VR]Nikon AF-S 400mm f/2.8D IF-ED II vs Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 400mm f/2.8G ED VR - Camer...[/url] is the link with the questionable information. I wholly agree Sparky. There likely wouldn't be very many sales of such a lens unless it were far less expensive than these focal lengths tend to be. Thanks to both of you for responding! I have now found a source that definitively says that this lens is a full-frame lens: [url=http://www.dpreview.com/products/nikon/lenses/nikon_400_2p8d_ii]Nikon AF-S Nikkor 400mm f/2.8D ED-IF II: Digital Photography Review[/url] WM [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikkor AF-S 400mm f2.8 II D ED IF Question
Top