Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Nikkor 70-200 f2.8 vr2 vs 135mm f2 DC for portraits
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gqtuazon" data-source="post: 338330" data-attributes="member: 6573"><p>The disadvantage of the Nikon VR1 were already mentioned including the weight. The f4 VR lens is much lighter, cheaper and is pretty sharp. People who owned both didn't like the performance of the f4 version when it comes to indoor low light scenes where the f4 had a slower AF. Just something to consider. I believe Rick has the f4 lens and maybe Jake. They might be able to chime in.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gqtuazon, post: 338330, member: 6573"] The disadvantage of the Nikon VR1 were already mentioned including the weight. The f4 VR lens is much lighter, cheaper and is pretty sharp. People who owned both didn't like the performance of the f4 version when it comes to indoor low light scenes where the f4 had a slower AF. Just something to consider. I believe Rick has the f4 lens and maybe Jake. They might be able to chime in. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Nikkor 70-200 f2.8 vr2 vs 135mm f2 DC for portraits
Top
