Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jgechev" data-source="post: 107501" data-attributes="member: 12606">I agree that the colors and dinamic range would be much better with the DSLR, but I dont know about the rest. Ive been doing some maths. Look in DOF requirements in these webpage <a href="http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/digital-camera-sensor-size.htm" target="_blank">Digital Camera Sensor Sizes: How it Influences Your Photography</a>A 1/2&quot; sensor with f4 with a 200mm lens, (712mm equivalent) would have the same DOF as the DSLR&nbsp; with 712mm with f14. With such a narrow diaphragm It will have some difraction blurness and I would have to slow the shutter speed pretty much and/or increase the ISO to 800 -1600. That would increase the noise quite a bit. Also as im using a 300 mm lens (450 effective) i would have to crop. So instead of 16 megapixels I would have 8 or less. So when I print the picture, I really dont know if the final print would be much better than the superzoom.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jgechev, post: 107501, member: 12606"] I agree that the colors and dinamic range would be much better with the DSLR, but I dont know about the rest. Ive been doing some maths. Look in DOF requirements in these webpage [url=http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/digital-camera-sensor-size.htm]Digital Camera Sensor Sizes: How it Influences Your Photography[/url] A 1/2" sensor with f4 with a 200mm lens, (712mm equivalent) would have the same DOF as the DSLR with 712mm with f14. With such a narrow diaphragm It will have some difraction blurness and I would have to slow the shutter speed pretty much and/or increase the ISO to 800 -1600. That would increase the noise quite a bit. Also as im using a 300 mm lens (450 effective) i would have to crop. So instead of 16 megapixels I would have 8 or less. So when I print the picture, I really dont know if the final print would be much better than the superzoom. [/QUOTE]

Verification