Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Nikkor 35mm f/1.4G vs 35mm f/1.8G
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eurotrash" data-source="post: 134368" data-attributes="member: 9237"><p>As we all know, lenses perform their best stopped down a few from their max aperture. So a 1.4 is (or rather, SHOULD BE) sharper at 1.8 than a 1.8 is at it's max aperture. I know my 50 1.4 is sharper than my 35 1.8 at f/1.8..</p><p></p><p>Reason 2 would be to sqeeze some creamy bokeh out of a shot.</p><p>Reason 3 would be to bump the shutter speed up a little bit if you need it.</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying it's definitely absolutely worth the money, but those are some prime reasons why they exist.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eurotrash, post: 134368, member: 9237"] As we all know, lenses perform their best stopped down a few from their max aperture. So a 1.4 is (or rather, SHOULD BE) sharper at 1.8 than a 1.8 is at it's max aperture. I know my 50 1.4 is sharper than my 35 1.8 at f/1.8.. Reason 2 would be to sqeeze some creamy bokeh out of a shot. Reason 3 would be to bump the shutter speed up a little bit if you need it. I'm not saying it's definitely absolutely worth the money, but those are some prime reasons why they exist. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Nikkor 35mm f/1.4G vs 35mm f/1.8G
Top
