Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
?: Nikkor 300mm f/4E PF ED VR vs. 300mm f/2.8 VR II
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 643396" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>I did a little digging to find some of Jake's comments. Rather than to post his direct quotes (don't want him getting a bunch of notifications that he's been quoted), I'll post the threads from where they originated.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="https://nikonites.com/telephoto/39990-300-pf-versus-200-500-a.html#ixzz4vuAeH6F2" target="_blank">https://nikonites.com/telephoto/39990-300-pf-versus-200-500-a.html#ixzz4vuAeH6F2</a></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #000000">The 300mm f2.8 VRii is an amazing lens. For a pro sports and/or wildlife shooter I believe it's a necessity. I don't know that I'd go with the original non-VR version. The size and weight mean you're never going to be anchored to a monopod with it (not that that's a bad thing).</span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><a href="https://nikonites.com/prime/38722-300mm-2-8-a.html#ixzz4vuAsQMyD" target="_blank">https://nikonites.com/prime/38722-300mm-2-8-a.html#ixzz4vuAsQMyD</a></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">Then if you go over to this thread, pages 33 & 34 have 4 of Jake's photos that I *think* are taken with his 300mm f/4 PF with a 1.4x teleconverter attached. They all show 420mm as the focal length.</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span>https://nikonites.com/d500/36698-post-your-d500-shots-33.html#axzz4vuC5ABqR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hark, post: 643396, member: 13196"] I did a little digging to find some of Jake's comments. Rather than to post his direct quotes (don't want him getting a bunch of notifications that he's been quoted), I'll post the threads from where they originated. [URL]https://nikonites.com/telephoto/39990-300-pf-versus-200-500-a.html#ixzz4vuAeH6F2[/URL] [COLOR=#000000]The 300mm f2.8 VRii is an amazing lens. For a pro sports and/or wildlife shooter I believe it's a necessity. I don't know that I'd go with the original non-VR version. The size and weight mean you're never going to be anchored to a monopod with it (not that that's a bad thing).[/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000] [URL]https://nikonites.com/prime/38722-300mm-2-8-a.html#ixzz4vuAsQMyD[/URL] Then if you go over to this thread, pages 33 & 34 have 4 of Jake's photos that I *think* are taken with his 300mm f/4 PF with a 1.4x teleconverter attached. They all show 420mm as the focal length. [/COLOR]https://nikonites.com/d500/36698-post-your-d500-shots-33.html#axzz4vuC5ABqR [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
?: Nikkor 300mm f/4E PF ED VR vs. 300mm f/2.8 VR II
Top