Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Nikkor 24mm 2.8 AF-D compared to newer Nikkor 28mm 1.8g
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gqtuazon" data-source="post: 226211" data-attributes="member: 6573"><p>Re: pros and cons. See #9. The price difference should already be a given, weight and the filter sizes since you can read specs just like anyone else.</p><p></p><p>With regards to the additional cost on the Nikon 24-70mm f2.8 vs prime, that's all up to you. For wedding and event photographers, the 24-70mm f2.8 and 70-200mm f2.8 are essential or must have. I have all of them and I got rid of my 24mm f2.8D, 50mm f1.4D, 85mm f1.8D, 20-35mm f2.8D lenses once I tried the G lenses. Is it worth the money? I would say so instead of buying and selling lenses just to save some cash here and there. These are long term investments and I know I can sell my lenses with very little loss compared to the camera bodies.</p><p></p><p>So take that for what it's worth but eventually, the decision remains on your side on whether to spend the money now or spend the money later.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gqtuazon, post: 226211, member: 6573"] Re: pros and cons. See #9. The price difference should already be a given, weight and the filter sizes since you can read specs just like anyone else. With regards to the additional cost on the Nikon 24-70mm f2.8 vs prime, that's all up to you. For wedding and event photographers, the 24-70mm f2.8 and 70-200mm f2.8 are essential or must have. I have all of them and I got rid of my 24mm f2.8D, 50mm f1.4D, 85mm f1.8D, 20-35mm f2.8D lenses once I tried the G lenses. Is it worth the money? I would say so instead of buying and selling lenses just to save some cash here and there. These are long term investments and I know I can sell my lenses with very little loss compared to the camera bodies. So take that for what it's worth but eventually, the decision remains on your side on whether to spend the money now or spend the money later. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Nikkor 24mm 2.8 AF-D compared to newer Nikkor 28mm 1.8g
Top