Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="nidding" data-source="post: 315662" data-attributes="member: 17555">Re: nidding's first year of shootingThanks, [USER=12257]@Pretzel[/USER], that's some really good advise right there <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />I don't use any of the prorammes you used, but the process and results are good to see. The second one is great, I think. Really nice and gritty. The first one has a cool feel to it as well,but the contrast in the face might be a little bit too much, I think.I have never really done fx-work before, so thank you for guiding me on the first step <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="nidding, post: 315662, member: 17555"] [b]Re: nidding's first year of shooting[/b] Thanks, [USER=12257]@Pretzel[/USER], that's some really good advise right there :) I don't use any of the prorammes you used, but the process and results are good to see. The second one is great, I think. Really nice and gritty. The first one has a cool feel to it as well,but the contrast in the face might be a little bit too much, I think. I have never really done fx-work before, so thank you for guiding me on the first step :) [/QUOTE]

Verification