Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="nidding" data-source="post: 294875" data-attributes="member: 17555">Re: nidding's first year of shootingGreat critique, wud! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />You are absolutely right. In my mind yesterday it made perfect sense to blur out the back of the front bouquet, but I think that was more or less only to emphasize the focus play. I totally agree with you however, that it only makes sense to go with the natural way it should work <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Looking at it today, I like the light however. It's shot with a single flash, and I actually think it works rather well and natural <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="nidding, post: 294875, member: 17555"] [b]Re: nidding's first year of shooting[/b] Great critique, wud! :) You are absolutely right. In my mind yesterday it made perfect sense to blur out the back of the front bouquet, but I think that was more or less only to emphasize the focus play. I totally agree with you however, that it only makes sense to go with the natural way it should work :) Looking at it today, I like the light however. It's shot with a single flash, and I actually think it works rather well and natural :) [/QUOTE]

Verification