Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3100
Next logical lens for beginner
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whiskeyman" data-source="post: 238278" data-attributes="member: 13556"><p>The difference between an f/1.4 lens and a 1.8 lens is about one-half a stop (.65 is closer to it). So, all other things being equal, you can use a shutter speed about 65% faster with the f/1.4 than the f/1.8 at max aperture. </p><p></p><p>And, with all else equal, the depth of field of the f/1.4 is less than the f/1.8. </p><p></p><p>When I purchased my 50mm and 85 mm lenses, I went with the f/1.8 versions, and will do the same when I purchase a 35 mm prime, because the above trade-offs weren't worth the greater lens prices to me. Even though I shoot a lot in low-light situations, the loss of depth of field isn't worth the extra speed that I get with the f/1.4. I just raise my ISO a stop and use a monopod.</p><p></p><p>If you go with FX (full-frame) lenses, there is another supposed advantage over DX: the DX sensor utilizes the center of the lenses projected image, which is sometimes call the "sweet spot" due to its superior image qualities.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whiskeyman, post: 238278, member: 13556"] The difference between an f/1.4 lens and a 1.8 lens is about one-half a stop (.65 is closer to it). So, all other things being equal, you can use a shutter speed about 65% faster with the f/1.4 than the f/1.8 at max aperture. And, with all else equal, the depth of field of the f/1.4 is less than the f/1.8. When I purchased my 50mm and 85 mm lenses, I went with the f/1.8 versions, and will do the same when I purchase a 35 mm prime, because the above trade-offs weren't worth the greater lens prices to me. Even though I shoot a lot in low-light situations, the loss of depth of field isn't worth the extra speed that I get with the f/1.4. I just raise my ISO a stop and use a monopod. If you go with FX (full-frame) lenses, there is another supposed advantage over DX: the DX sensor utilizes the center of the lenses projected image, which is sometimes call the "sweet spot" due to its superior image qualities. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3100
Next logical lens for beginner
Top