Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3200
Next Camera up?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blade Canyon" data-source="post: 335130" data-attributes="member: 15302"><p>This confuses me. If a DX is just a smaller sensor, then does DX really "reach out" better? Or is it the same as shooting FX with the exact same lens and then just cropping in post? This is a genuine question; I'm not just trying to make a point. Nikon used this same argument in their D600 promotional video, that being able to switch to DX helps you reach out when it's needed. I have a D600, and the default setting for the front Fn button was FX/DX swap, which I accidentally hit while shooting some elk in Wyoming, and I swear those DX photos look really great when they go by on my screen saver.</p><p></p><p>ETA: I just read the article that WayneF linked, and it said DX is just pre-cropping an FX shot. IOW, there is no difference between shooting DX versus shooting FX and cropping in post. Does anyone have a counter-argument? I could get that Nikon puts more MP in a dedicated DX sensor than in the DX crop portion of an FX sensor, for example.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blade Canyon, post: 335130, member: 15302"] This confuses me. If a DX is just a smaller sensor, then does DX really "reach out" better? Or is it the same as shooting FX with the exact same lens and then just cropping in post? This is a genuine question; I'm not just trying to make a point. Nikon used this same argument in their D600 promotional video, that being able to switch to DX helps you reach out when it's needed. I have a D600, and the default setting for the front Fn button was FX/DX swap, which I accidentally hit while shooting some elk in Wyoming, and I swear those DX photos look really great when they go by on my screen saver. ETA: I just read the article that WayneF linked, and it said DX is just pre-cropping an FX shot. IOW, there is no difference between shooting DX versus shooting FX and cropping in post. Does anyone have a counter-argument? I could get that Nikon puts more MP in a dedicated DX sensor than in the DX crop portion of an FX sensor, for example. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3200
Next Camera up?
Top