Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="cwgrizz" data-source="post: 360596" data-attributes="member: 27017"><p>As I read the proposal, I think it is in reference to US "designated wilderness" areas that have been set aside to protect from destruction, not the entire US Forests.  The designated wilderness areas are already under strict regulations pertaining to vehicular travel, people access, etc.  I believe the intent of this (even though they probably aren't getting it right) is to give a way for someone (commercial or Other) to get access under some very strict guidelines and of course the FEE. I could really get into my feelings on all of this stuff; protection, restrictions, fees, etc. but it would really get political and this is not the place for it. Ha!!</p></blockquote><p></p>