Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikonites
New Member Introductions
New to Nikonites, from Alberta Canada
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fortkentdad" data-source="post: 296218" data-attributes="member: 24285"><p>Right now I'm leaning much more towards the D7100 and some good glass. I have an older film (FX I guess) 300 mm Sigma lens that does mount on the D5100, manual focus, but works well. I understand the D7100 will focus these older (circa 2001) lenses and that with the crop factor the 300 becomes a 400 (or better if I go to the D7100's own cropped mode). That would be good use of an old lense. I also have the old kit lens that came with my F60 Nikon film 35 mm camera (goes up to 100mm I believe) so that would give me a better range over the DX kit lens I have now. And looking at the D600 I'm not sold - top of the line DX, or bargin basement FX? They cut corners to get the D600 (610) price under $2000. As I look at it I'm really comparing the D7100 or take the big jump to a D800. That is only 3x the price, $2 grand more. Thats a nice bit of glass. Researching it on line I've found sites that post comparative pictures with the D7100, D600 and D800 (and one included the D5200 too). And frankly I could not see the difference in image quality, even when they enlarged as small cropped section of an bridge. Details were just fine. I also read that some semi-pro's use the D7100 for a variety of reasons (budget is probably one). So the D800 is on my "when i win the lottery" list, the D7100 is one I may be able to save my pennies for.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fortkentdad, post: 296218, member: 24285"] Right now I'm leaning much more towards the D7100 and some good glass. I have an older film (FX I guess) 300 mm Sigma lens that does mount on the D5100, manual focus, but works well. I understand the D7100 will focus these older (circa 2001) lenses and that with the crop factor the 300 becomes a 400 (or better if I go to the D7100's own cropped mode). That would be good use of an old lense. I also have the old kit lens that came with my F60 Nikon film 35 mm camera (goes up to 100mm I believe) so that would give me a better range over the DX kit lens I have now. And looking at the D600 I'm not sold - top of the line DX, or bargin basement FX? They cut corners to get the D600 (610) price under $2000. As I look at it I'm really comparing the D7100 or take the big jump to a D800. That is only 3x the price, $2 grand more. Thats a nice bit of glass. Researching it on line I've found sites that post comparative pictures with the D7100, D600 and D800 (and one included the D5200 too). And frankly I could not see the difference in image quality, even when they enlarged as small cropped section of an bridge. Details were just fine. I also read that some semi-pro's use the D7100 for a variety of reasons (budget is probably one). So the D800 is on my "when i win the lottery" list, the D7100 is one I may be able to save my pennies for. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikonites
New Member Introductions
New to Nikonites, from Alberta Canada
Top