Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 550160" data-attributes="member: 13196">It seems as though Nikon has lowered the MSRP of the current 70-300mm VR lens down to $499.95. It was over $500 when I bought mine. That current lens is really good which makes me wonder if the replacement will be any better. Just like their new 24-70mm f/2.8 VR reviews indicate that lens isn't quite as sharp optically as the non-VR model, it makes me I wonder just how much improvement this new 70-300mm VR lens will have over their current model. Thanks for the heads-up. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />I recently watched a comparison video of a Yongnuo lens (I believe it was also a 50mm lens) against a Canon lens. The Yongnuo wasn't anywhere close to the Canon's ability.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="hark, post: 550160, member: 13196"] It seems as though Nikon has lowered the MSRP of the current 70-300mm VR lens down to $499.95. It was over $500 when I bought mine. That current lens is really good which makes me wonder if the replacement will be any better. Just like their new 24-70mm f/2.8 VR reviews indicate that lens isn't quite as sharp optically as the non-VR model, it makes me I wonder just how much improvement this new 70-300mm VR lens will have over their current model. Thanks for the heads-up. :) I recently watched a comparison video of a Yongnuo lens (I believe it was also a 50mm lens) against a Canon lens. The Yongnuo wasn't anywhere close to the Canon's ability. [/QUOTE]

Verification